|
NYAGRA news release 3 Jan 2001
An open letter to gender rights activists
In late 2000 and early 2001, controversy erupted within the transgender community around the new strategic direction
for GenderPAC announced by Riki Anne Wilchins, GenderPAC's executive director. In response, 22 activists signed an open
letter to the community in January 2001. For more information on that controversy, read the open letter.
Jan. 3, 2001
Dear Friends and Colleagues:
We are writing to you to express our concern about the current crisis in transgender politics. We think it is time to start a
broadly based dialogue to examine productive responses to this situation.
The new century brings with it considerable opportunity and promise for the transgender community, particularly in view of the
organizing taking place on the state and local level. The formation of the New York Association for Gender Rights Advocacy (NYAGRA)
in June 1998 and the recent launch of the Gender Rights Advocacy Association of New Jersey (GRAANJ) represent a significant advance
for the transgender political communities in the Northeast. Existing transgender groups like It's Time, Illinois and individual
trans-activists have built increasingly fruitful relationships with state LGBT political organizations.
However, a disturbing vacuum is developing at the national political level. For the last few years, GenderPAC has functioned in
fact, if not in name, as the voice of the trans-community on federal public policy issues. But, after a year of wrenching internal
struggle, that organization is now distancing itself rapidly from transgender concerns and community.
We share with Riki Anne Wilchins, GenderPAC's executive director, a critique of the narrow 'identity politics' that would divorce
the concerns of transgender-identified people from a broader politics which recognizes oppressions experienced by *all* people
who express their gender in non-normative ways. In our advocacy work, we try to find ways to take into account the complexities
of variant expressions of gender without falling into simplistic identity categories.
But in the name of "non-identity politics," GenderPAC is now pursuing a "mainstreaming" strategy that
appears to involve de-emphasizing its connection to the trans-community. This new focus has resulted in the dropping of some of
GenderPAC's transgender-focused projects. GenderPAC's call for its "National Conference on Gender" next spring made it clear that
proposals for trans-focused workshops would not be well received.
Additionally, GenderPAC's Congressional E.E.O. Project, which it launched with great fanfare earlier this year and which it still
touts as its showpiece effort in the political world, has, in fact, been languishing since early summer.
Sadly, trans-identified GenderPAC directors who have spoken in support of a transgender focus have been treated with considerable
disrespect and pressured to resign.
GenderPAC was founded as a coalition of transgender-specific and other queer organizations with a mission to pursue the political
empowerment of the transgender community through advocacy, federal legislation and other means. The scuttling of this original
mission in favor of a vague focus as a 'national gender rights organization' means that there is now no credible organization
to advocate on behalf of the transgender community at the national level. With queer concerns occupying a growing place on the
national political agenda, we cannot afford to let this come about.
Given these recent disturbing developments, we believe that there is an urgent need to begin a discussion within the transgender
community about reviving a presence at the national level. Toward that end, we would like to invite all interested gender activists
-- whether the primary focus of their work is political, educational, or cultural -- to participate in a broad-ranging discussion
of the issues raised by GenderPAC's dramatic shift in direction. We are planning to organize an e-group as the most feasible way
to include interested individuals in such a discussion.
If you are interested in taking part, please let us know. But even if you are not, we would love to
hear your views on the community's situation at the dawn of the 21st century.
For more information on the issue, e-mail Pauline Park,
co-chair of NYAGRA, who participated in drafting the letter.
Contact:
Pauline Park
|